🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, following a controversial law change that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.